After the COVID-19 pandemic stopped many asylum procedures around Europe, new technologies are reviving these types of systems. Via lie detection tools examined at the line to a program for confirming documents and transcribes interviews, a wide range of technologies is being used by asylum applications. This article explores just how these technology have reshaped the ways asylum procedures happen to be conducted. It reveals how asylum seekers are transformed into pressured hindered techno-users: They are asked to adhere to a series of techno-bureaucratic steps also to keep up with unpredictable tiny within criteria and deadlines. This obstructs their capacity to find the way these systems and to go after their right for cover.
It also demonstrates how these technologies happen to be embedded in refugee governance: They accomplish the ‘circuits of financial-humanitarianism’ that function through a whirlwind of dispersed technological requirements. These requirements increase asylum seekers’ socio-legal precarity simply by hindering them from being able to view the channels of safety. It portals of the board of directors for advising migrant workers further states that examines of securitization and victimization should be along with an insight in the disciplinary mechanisms of these technologies, through which migrants will be turned into data-generating subjects so, who are disciplined by their reliability on technology.
Drawing on Foucault’s notion of power/knowledge and comarcal expertise, the article argues that these technology have an inherent obstructiveness. They have a double effect: although they assistance to expedite the asylum procedure, they also produce it difficult just for refugees to navigate these systems. They are simply positioned in a ‘knowledge deficit’ that makes these people vulnerable to bogus decisions made by non-governmental actors, and ill-informed and unreliable narratives about their instances. Moreover, that they pose new risks of’machine mistakes’ which may result in inaccurate or discriminatory outcomes.